ABCode Cache Warmer vs WP Super Cache

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Health B83

Health A87

Active-install trajectory

No change to chart. WordPress.org reports active installs in coarse bands, so neither plugin crossed a band during this window. The download trend below moves daily and is the better read over a period this short.

Metric	ABCode Cache Warmer	WP Super Cache
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	20–30	1M–2M ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	0%	0%
Overall health	B · 83	A · 87 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	100/100	100/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	74/100	83/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (adjusted)	3.98★	4.28★ ✓
Reviews	1	1,346 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	88/100	97/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Low	Low
Last updated	1mo ago	29d ago ✓
Downloads · 30d	123	942.4K ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	6.2% ✓	1.5%
Category	Performance	Performance

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

ABCode Cache WarmerWP Super Cache

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.