← Compare

ACF Beautiful Flexible vs ACF Fold Flexible Content

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

ACF Fold Flexible Content and ACF Beautiful Flexible are close on health (D · 46 vs D · 45), with nothing separating them on the sub-scores.

Active-install trajectory

ACF Fold Flexible Content moved down one install band, 400+ to 300+. That's a single step across the whole window, so there's no trajectory to draw. The download trend below moves daily.

Metric	ACF Beautiful Flexible	ACF Fold Flexible Content
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	100–200	300–400 ✓
Active installs, change over ~6 months Compares the public install bands. One band step shows as the band change, not a percentage.	Stable ✓	-25%
Overall health	D · 45	D · 46 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	3/100	3/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	74/100	78/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.0★	4.1★ ✓
Reviews	1	4 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	43/100 ✓	38/100
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Elevated ✓	High
Last updated	4.2y ago ✓	10.1y ago
Downloads, last 30d	108	141 ✓
Download momentum, last 30d vs prior 30d Dips that follow a release spike are normal: wp.org counts every update as a download, so the weeks after a release run lower.	+19%	+40%
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	3.7% ✓	1.6%
Category	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

ACF Beautiful FlexibleACF Fold Flexible Content

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.