← Compare

Blocks for ACF Fields vs Meta Field Block

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Meta Field Block and Blocks for ACF Fields are close on health (A · 91 vs A · 88). Meta Field Block has the stronger rating quality.

Active-install trajectory

Blocks for ACF Fields moved up one install band, 1K+ to 2K+. That's a single step across the whole window, so there's no trajectory to draw. The download trend below moves daily.

Metric	Blocks for ACF Fields	Meta Field Block
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	2K–3K	10K–20K ✓
Active installs, change over ~6 months Compares the public install bands. One band step shows as the band change, not a percentage.	1K+ → 2K+ ✓	Stable
Overall health	A · 88	A · 91 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	100/100	100/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	87/100	96/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.4★	4.8★ ✓
Reviews	13	57 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	93/100	98/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Low	Low
Last updated	5d ago ✓	18d ago
Downloads, last 30d	2.9K	15.2K ✓
Download momentum, last 30d vs prior 30d Dips that follow a release spike are normal: wp.org counts every update as a download, so the weeks after a release run lower.	+57%	+32%
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	7.8% ✓	5.0%
Category	Blocks	Developer Tools

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

Blocks for ACF FieldsMeta Field Block

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.