ACF: Google Maps Field (Multiple Markers) vs Advanced Custom Fields: Nav Menu Field
Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.
Advanced Custom Fields: Nav Menu Field is the safest pick: health D · 51 against 45 for ACF: Google Maps Field (Multiple Markers), led by stronger rating quality.
Advanced Custom Fields: Nav Menu Field moved down one install band, 9K+ to 8K+. That's a single step across the whole window, so there's no trajectory to draw. The download trend below moves daily.
Metric
ACF: Google Maps Field (Multiple Markers)
Advanced Custom Fields: Nav Menu Field
Active installsModeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.
200–300
8K–9K ✓
Active installs, change over ~6 monthsCompares the public install bands. One band step shows as the band change, not a percentage.
Stable ✓
-11%
Overall health
D · 45
D · 51 ✓
MaintenanceHow recently the plugin was updated.
3/100
3/100
Rating qualityVolume-adjusted review quality.
76/100
93/100 ✓
SupportShare of forum threads marked resolved.
70/100
70/100
Rating (weighted for review count)
4.1★
4.7★ ✓
Reviews
2
33 ✓
Ranking optimizationHow well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.
44/100
45/100 ✓
Removal riskMaintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.
Elevated ✓
High
Last updated
4.4y ago ✓
8.9y ago
Downloads, last 30d
121
1.5K ✓
Download momentum, last 30d vs prior 30dDips that follow a release spike are normal: wp.org counts every update as a download, so the weeks after a release run lower.
+17%
+24%
Install conversionActive installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.
4.7%
5.6% ✓
Category
Developer Tools
Developer Tools
✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.
Release activity
ACF: Google Maps Field (Multiple Markers)Advanced Custom Fields: Nav Menu Field
7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.