Plugin Pulse
← Compare

ACF: Rus-To-Lat vs Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Active-install trajectory

ACF: Rus-To-Lat Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field

Active installs, each indexed to 100 at the start of the window. A line above 100 is growing its install base, below 100 is shrinking.

Metric ACF: Rus-To-Lat Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads. 2K–3K 4K–5K
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window. -33% +33%
Overall health D · 41 D · 52
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated. 3/100 17/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality. 65/100 78/100
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved. 70/100 70/100
Rating (adjusted) 3.60★ 4.11★
Reviews 0 5
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org. 38/100 60/100
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status. High Elevated
Last updated 7.8y ago 2.5y ago
Downloads · 30d 179 598
Category Uncategorized Admin & Utilities

marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

ACF: Rus-To-Lat Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.