ACF Timber Integration vs ACF Feeds for Gravity Forms

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

ACF Timber Integration

by Dream Production

Health D45

ACF Feeds for Gravity Forms

by Alex Chernov

Health D45

Active-install trajectory

ACF Timber IntegrationACF Feeds for Gravity Forms

Active installs, each indexed to 100 at the start of the window. A line above 100 is growing its install base, below 100 is shrinking.

Metric	ACF Timber Integration	ACF Feeds for Gravity Forms
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	200–300 ✓	80–90
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	-33%	-20% ✓
Overall health	D · 45	D · 45
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	3/100	3/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	74/100	74/100
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.0★	4.0★
Reviews	1	1
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	40/100	42/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	High	Elevated ✓
Last updated	5.7y ago	5.2y ago ✓
Downloads · 30d	123 ✓	98
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	2.4%	2.9% ✓
Category	Uncategorized	Content & Feeds

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

ACF Timber IntegrationACF Feeds for Gravity Forms

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.