Plugin Pulse
← Compare

ACF Token Input vs Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®)

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Active-install trajectory

No change to chart. WordPress.org reports active installs in coarse bands, so neither plugin crossed a band during this window. The download trend below moves daily and is the better read over a period this short.

Metric ACF Token Input Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®)
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads. — 2M–3M ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window. — 0% ✓
Overall health — A · 96 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated. 4/100 100/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality. — 88/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved. — 100/100 ✓
Rating (adjusted) — 4.46★ ✓
Reviews 0 1,440 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org. 49/100 98/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status. Elevated Low ✓
Last updated 3.9y ago 14d ago ✓
Downloads · 30d 28 1.6M ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower. — 2.6% ✓
Category Uncategorized Uncategorized

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

ACF Token InputAdvanced Custom Fields (ACF®)

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.