Plugin Pulse Beta
← Compare

AI Internal Links vs Internal Links Manager

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Internal Links Manager is the safest pick: health A · 89 against 83 for AI Internal Links, led by stronger rating quality.

Active-install trajectory

AI Internal LinksInternal Links Manager

Active installs, each indexed to 100 at the start of the window. A line above 100 is growing its install base, below 100 is shrinking.

Metric AI Internal Links Internal Links Manager
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads. 200–300 10K–20K ✓
Active installs, change over ~6 months Compares the public install bands. One band step shows as the band change, not a percentage. +1900% ✓ Stable
Overall health B · 83 A · 89 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated. 100/100 100/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality. 74/100 89/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved. 70/100 70/100
Rating (weighted for review count) 4.0★ 4.5★ ✓
Reviews 1 33 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org. 88/100 97/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status. Low Low
Last updated 2mo ago 18d ago ✓
Downloads, last 30d 650 11.9K ✓
Download momentum, last 30d vs prior 30d Dips that follow a release spike are normal: wp.org counts every update as a download, so the weeks after a release run lower. -15% +206%
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower. 4.8% ✓ 4.3%
Category AI SEO

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

AI Internal LinksInternal Links Manager

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.