AutoThumb vs Webp Transformer

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Health D45

Health D51

Active-install trajectory

AutoThumb moved up one install band, 70+ to 80+. That's a single step across the whole window, so there's no trajectory to draw. The download trend below moves daily.

Metric	AutoThumb	Webp Transformer
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	80–90	200–300 ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	+14% ✓	0%
Overall health	D · 45 ✓	—
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	3/100	26/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	74/100 ✓	—
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100 ✓	—
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.0★ ✓	—
Reviews	1 ✓	0
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	36/100	59/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	High	Low ✓
Last updated	14.8y ago	2.0y ago ✓
Downloads · 30d	84	117 ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	0.5%	6.0% ✓
Category	Uncategorized	Performance

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

AutoThumbWebp Transformer

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.