Plugin Pulse Beta
← Compare

Bandwidth Saver: Image CDN vs Autoptimize

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Active-install trajectory

Autoptimize moved down one install band, 900K+ to 800K+. That's a single step across the whole window, so there's no trajectory to draw. The download trend below moves daily.

Metric Bandwidth Saver: Image CDN Autoptimize
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads. — 800K–900K ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window. — -11% ✓
Overall health B · 83 A · 94 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated. 100/100 100/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality. 74/100 94/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved. 70/100 86/100 ✓
Rating (adjusted) 3.98★ 4.72★ ✓
Reviews 1 1,428 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org. 88/100 96/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status. Low Low
Last updated 24d ago 7d ago ✓
Downloads · 30d 126 579.6K ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower. — 1.8% ✓
Category Performance Performance

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

Bandwidth Saver: Image CDNAutoptimize

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.