Cache by Folium vs SpeedyCache

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Health B81

Health A86

Active-install trajectory

Cache by Folium moved down one install band, 200+ to 100+; SpeedyCache moved down one install band, 600K+ to 500K+. That's a single step across the whole window, so there's no trajectory to draw. The download trend below moves daily.

Metric	Cache by Folium	SpeedyCache
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	100–200	500K–600K ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	-50%	-17% ✓
Overall health	B · 81	A · 86 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	93/100	100/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	76/100	81/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (adjusted)	4.04★	4.23★ ✓
Reviews	10	30 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	91/100	96/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Low	Low
Last updated	5mo ago	25d ago ✓
Downloads · 30d	196	162.4K ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	0.3%	10% ✓
Category	Performance	Performance

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

Cache by FoliumSpeedyCache

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.