← Compare

ChargeWP vs Custom Profile Picture

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Custom Profile Picture is the safest pick: health B · 81 against 70 for ChargeWP, led by stronger maintenance.

Active-install trajectory

ChargeWPCustom Profile Picture

Active installs, each indexed to 100 at the start of the window. A line above 100 is growing its install base, below 100 is shrinking.

Metric	ChargeWP	Custom Profile Picture
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	30–40	300–400 ✓
Active installs, change over ~6 months Compares the public install bands. One band step shows as the band change, not a percentage.	+200%	+650% ✓
Overall health	B · 70	B · 81 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	66/100	95/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	74/100 ✓	73/100
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.0★ ✓	3.9★
Reviews	1	4 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	78/100	89/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Low	Low
Last updated	11mo ago	4mo ago ✓
Downloads, last 30d	144	304 ✓
Download momentum, last 30d vs prior 30d Dips that follow a release spike are normal: wp.org counts every update as a download, so the weeks after a release run lower.	+10%	+28%
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	3.3%	13% ✓
Category	eCommerce	Login & Users

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

ChargeWPCustom Profile Picture

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.