Easy WP Optimizer vs LiteSpeed Cache

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Health D41

Health A87

Active-install trajectory

No change to chart. WordPress.org reports active installs in coarse bands, so neither plugin crossed a band during this window. The download trend below moves daily and is the better read over a period this short.

Metric	Easy WP Optimizer	LiteSpeed Cache
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	30–40	7M–8M ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	0%	0%
Overall health	—	A · 87 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	3/100	100/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	—	95/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	—	56/100 ✓
Rating (adjusted)	—	4.78★ ✓
Reviews	0	2,772 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	37/100	91/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	High	Low ✓
Last updated	8.2y ago	23d ago ✓
Downloads · 30d	83	2.5M ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	0.7%	5.1% ✓
Category	Performance	Performance

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

Easy WP OptimizerLiteSpeed Cache

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.