Feedbucket vs Marker.io

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Health B84

Health B78

Active-install trajectory

No change to chart. WordPress.org reports active installs in coarse bands, so neither plugin crossed a band during this window. The download trend below moves daily and is the better read over a period this short.

Metric	Feedbucket	Marker.io
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	1K–2K	4K–5K ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	0%	0%
Overall health	B · 84 ✓	B · 78
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	96/100 ✓	68/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	81/100	95/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.2★	4.7★ ✓
Reviews	5	44 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	90/100 ✓	88/100
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Low	Low
Last updated	4mo ago ✓	11mo ago
Downloads · 30d	1.3K	7.6K ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	3.7% ✓	1.3%
Category	Analytics	Analytics

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

FeedbucketMarker.io

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.