FeedFocal vs UserFeedback

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

FeedFocal

by FeedFocal

Health C63

UserFeedback

by Syed Balkhi

Health A91

Active-install trajectory

FeedFocal UserFeedback

Active installs, each indexed to 100 at the start of the window. A line above 100 is growing its install base, below 100 is shrinking.

Metric	FeedFocal	UserFeedback
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	2K–3K	200K–300K ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	0%	0%
Overall health	C · 63	A · 91 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	50/100	100/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	73/100	95/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (adjusted)	3.92★	4.75★ ✓
Reviews	3	305 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	77/100	99/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Low	Low
Last updated	1.3y ago	2mo ago ✓
Downloads · 30d	514	37.0K ✓
Category	Login & Users	Analytics

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

FeedFocal UserFeedback

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.