Plugin Pulse Beta
← Compare

Fetch JFT vs Hosted JFT

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Fetch JFT

by pjaudiomv

Health B83
Hosted JFT

by pjaudiomv

Health D43

Active-install trajectory

No change to chart. WordPress.org reports active installs in coarse bands, so neither plugin crossed a band during this window. The download trend below moves daily and is the better read over a period this short.

Metric Fetch JFT Hosted JFT
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads. 100–200 ✓ —
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window. 0% ✓ —
Overall health B · 83 ✓ —
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated. 100/100 ✓ 6/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality. 74/100 ✓ —
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved. 70/100 ✓ —
Rating (adjusted) 3.99★ ✓ —
Reviews 2 ✓ 0
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org. 87/100 ✓ 51/100
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status. Low ✓ Elevated
Last updated 5d ago ✓ 3.5y ago
Downloads · 30d 296 ✓ 39
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower. 1.3% ✓ —
Category Uncategorized Uncategorized

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

Fetch JFTHosted JFT

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.