FV Gravatar Cache vs Harrys Gravatar Cache

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

FV Gravatar Cache

by FolioVision

Health C63

Harrys Gravatar Cache

by Harry Milatz

Health D47

Active-install trajectory

FV Gravatar Cache Harrys Gravatar Cache

Active installs, each indexed to 100 at the start of the window. A line above 100 is growing its install base, below 100 is shrinking.

Metric	FV Gravatar Cache	Harrys Gravatar Cache
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	600–700 ✓	200–300
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	-14% ✓	-33%
Overall health	C · 63 ✓	D · 47
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	50/100 ✓	3/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	72/100	80/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (adjusted)	3.90★	4.17★ ✓
Reviews	11 ✓	4
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	75/100 ✓	45/100
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Low ✓	Elevated
Last updated	1.3y ago ✓	4.6y ago
Downloads · 30d	174 ✓	69
Category	Performance	Performance

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

FV Gravatar Cache Harrys Gravatar Cache

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.