← Compare

GF to BF vs Replace Google Fonts with Bunny Fonts

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Replace Google Fonts with Bunny Fonts and GF to BF are close on health (D · 46 vs D · 45), with nothing separating them on the sub-scores.

Active-install trajectory

Replace Google Fonts with Bunny Fonts moved down one install band, 1K+ to 900+. That's a single step across the whole window, so there's no trajectory to draw. The download trend below moves daily.

Metric	GF to BF	Replace Google Fonts with Bunny Fonts
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	—	900–1K ✓
Active installs, change over ~6 months Compares the public install bands. One band step shows as the band change, not a percentage.	—	-10% ✓
Overall health	D · 45	D · 46 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	4/100 ✓	3/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	74/100	77/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.0★	4.1★ ✓
Reviews	1	10 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	42/100	45/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Elevated	Elevated
Last updated	3.8y ago ✓	3.9y ago
Downloads, last 30d	27	192 ✓
Download momentum, last 30d vs prior 30d Dips that follow a release spike are normal: wp.org counts every update as a download, so the weeks after a release run lower.	-50%	+70%
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	—	8.6% ✓
Category	Uncategorized	Uncategorized

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

GF to BFReplace Google Fonts with Bunny Fonts

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.