Harrys Gravatar Cache vs FV Gravatar Cache

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Harrys Gravatar Cache

by Harry Milatz

Health D47

FV Gravatar Cache

by FolioVision

Health C63

Active-install trajectory

Harrys Gravatar Cache FV Gravatar Cache

Active installs, each indexed to 100 at the start of the window. A line above 100 is growing its install base, below 100 is shrinking.

Metric	Harrys Gravatar Cache	FV Gravatar Cache
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	200–300	600–700 ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	-33%	-14% ✓
Overall health	D · 47	C · 63 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	3/100	50/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	80/100 ✓	72/100
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (adjusted)	4.17★ ✓	3.90★
Reviews	4	11 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	45/100	75/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Elevated	Low ✓
Last updated	4.6y ago	1.3y ago ✓
Downloads · 30d	72	174 ✓
Category	Performance	Performance

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

Harrys Gravatar Cache FV Gravatar Cache

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.