Plugin Pulse
← Compare

Insert Content vs The Content Injection

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Active-install trajectory

No change to chart. WordPress.org reports active installs in coarse bands, so neither plugin crossed a band during this window. The download trend below moves daily and is the better read over a period this short.

Metric Insert Content The Content Injection
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads. 10–20 10–20
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window. 0% 0%
Overall health C · 58 ✓ D · 45
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated. 36/100 ✓ 3/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality. 74/100 76/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved. 70/100 70/100
Rating (adjusted) 3.98★ 4.06★ ✓
Reviews 1 2 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org. 72/100 ✓ 33/100
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status. Low ✓ High
Last updated 1.6y ago ✓ 10.9y ago
Downloads · 30d 37 66 ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower. 1.2% ✓ 0.3%
Category Uncategorized Uncategorized

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

Insert ContentThe Content Injection

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.