Internet Archive Wayback Machine Link Fixer vs Archivarix Broken Links Recovery
Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.
Internet Archive Wayback Machine Link Fixer and Archivarix Broken Links Recovery are close on health (B · 82 vs B · 79). Internet Archive Wayback Machine Link Fixer has the stronger maintenance.
Internet Archive Wayback Machine Link FixerArchivarix Broken Links Recovery
Active installs, each indexed to 100 at the start of the window. A line above 100 is growing its install base, below 100 is shrinking.
Metric
Internet Archive Wayback Machine Link Fixer
Archivarix Broken Links Recovery
Active installsModeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.
1K–2K ✓
200–300
Active installs, change over ~6 monthsCompares the public install bands. One band step shows as the band change, not a percentage.
Stable
+1900% ✓
Overall health
B · 82 ✓
B · 79
MaintenanceHow recently the plugin was updated.
100/100 ✓
90/100
Rating qualityVolume-adjusted review quality.
71/100
72/100 ✓
SupportShare of forum threads marked resolved.
70/100
70/100
Rating (weighted for review count)
3.8★
3.9★ ✓
Reviews
8 ✓
1
Ranking optimizationHow well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.
88/100
88/100
Removal riskMaintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.
Low
Low
Last updated
18d ago ✓
6mo ago
Downloads, last 30d
2.9K ✓
220
Download momentum, last 30d vs prior 30dDips that follow a release spike are normal: wp.org counts every update as a download, so the weeks after a release run lower.
+10%
+26%
Install conversionActive installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.
4.5%
7.2% ✓
Category
Uncategorized
Uncategorized
✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.
Release activity
Internet Archive Wayback Machine Link FixerArchivarix Broken Links Recovery
7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.