Plugin Pulse Beta
← Compare

Irisnet API Client vs AI Provider for Anthropic

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Active-install trajectory

No change to chart. WordPress.org reports active installs in coarse bands, so neither plugin crossed a band during this window. The download trend below moves daily and is the better read over a period this short.

Metric Irisnet API Client AI Provider for Anthropic
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads. — 70K–80K ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window. — +9900% ✓
Overall health D · 48 ✓ —
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated. 9/100 100/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality. 76/100 ✓ —
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved. 70/100 ✓ —
Rating (weighted for review count) 4.1★ ✓ —
Reviews 2 ✓ 0
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org. 52/100 75/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status. Elevated Low ✓
Last updated 2.9y ago 1mo ago ✓
Downloads · 30d 83 53.2K ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower. — 28% ✓
Category AI AI

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

Irisnet API ClientAI Provider for Anthropic

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.