← Compare

MigraMetrics: Site Speed Comparator vs LiteSpeed Cache

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

LiteSpeed Cache is the safest pick: health A · 89 against 82 for MigraMetrics: Site Speed Comparator, led by stronger rating quality.

Active-install trajectory

No change to chart. WordPress.org reports active installs in coarse bands, so neither plugin crossed a band during this window. The download trend below moves daily and is the better read over a period this short.

Metric	MigraMetrics: Site Speed Comparator	LiteSpeed Cache
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	—	7M–8M ✓
Active installs, change over ~6 months Compares the public install bands. One band step shows as the band change, not a percentage.	—	Stable ✓
Overall health	B · 82	A · 89 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	96/100	100/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	74/100	96/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100 ✓	62/100
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.0★	4.8★ ✓
Reviews	1	2,778 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	88/100	92/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Low	Low
Last updated	4mo ago	3d ago ✓
Downloads, last 30d	64	3.3M ✓
Download momentum, last 30d vs prior 30d Dips that follow a release spike are normal: wp.org counts every update as a download, so the weeks after a release run lower.	+52%	-25%
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	—	4.9% ✓
Category	Backup	Performance

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

MigraMetrics: Site Speed ComparatorLiteSpeed Cache

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.