Plugin Pulse Beta
← Compare

Full Screen Background Images vs Autoptimize

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Active-install trajectory

Full Screen Background ImagesAutoptimize

Active installs, each indexed to 100 at the start of the window. A line above 100 is growing its install base, below 100 is shrinking.

Metric Full Screen Background Images Autoptimize
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads. 70–80 800K–900K ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window. -13% -11% ✓
Overall health D · 45 A · 92 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated. 3/100 100/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality. 76/100 94/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved. 70/100 75/100 ✓
Rating (weighted for review count) 4.1★ 4.7★ ✓
Reviews 2 1,428 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org. 35/100 94/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status. High Low ✓
Last updated 10.5y ago 11d ago ✓
Downloads · 30d 80 584.2K ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower. 0.5% 1.8% ✓
Category Uncategorized Performance

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

Full Screen Background ImagesAutoptimize

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.