Plugin Pulse
← Compare

NPATI Content Automation vs NeuroContent

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Active-install trajectory

No change to chart. WordPress.org reports active installs in coarse bands, so neither plugin crossed a band during this window. The download trend below moves daily and is the better read over a period this short.

Metric NPATI Content Automation NeuroContent
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.
Overall health
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated. 100/100 100/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.
Rating (adjusted)
Reviews 0 0
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org. 88/100 88/100
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status. Low Low
Last updated 27d ago 3d ago
Downloads · 30d 129 214
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.
Category AI AI

marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

NPATI Content AutomationNeuroContent

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.