Media Usage Tracker vs SEO'n'AI

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

SEO'n'AI is the safest pick: health B · 83 against 68 for Media Usage Tracker, led by stronger maintenance.

Media Usage Tracker

by iveyb

Health C68

SEO'n'AI

by Gerald G.

Health B83

Active-install trajectory

Media Usage TrackerSEO'n'AI

Active installs, each indexed to 100 at the start of the window. A line above 100 is growing its install base, below 100 is shrinking.

Metric	Media Usage Tracker	SEO'n'AI
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	30–40	100–200 ✓
Active installs, change over ~6 months Compares the public install bands. One band step shows as the band change, not a percentage.	+200% ✓	+25%
Overall health	C · 68	B · 83 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	66/100	100/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	69/100	74/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (weighted for review count)	3.8★	4.0★ ✓
Reviews	2 ✓	1
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	78/100	88/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Low	Low
Last updated	11mo ago	3mo ago ✓
Downloads, last 30d	101	216 ✓
Download momentum, last 30d vs prior 30d Dips that follow a release spike are normal: wp.org counts every update as a download, so the weeks after a release run lower.	+6%	+31%
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	4.3%	14% ✓
Category	Media	Media

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

Media Usage TrackerSEO'n'AI

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.