Optimum Gravatar Cache vs FV Gravatar Cache

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Optimum Gravatar Cache

by José Miguel

Health D51

FV Gravatar Cache

by FolioVision

Health C62

Active-install trajectory

Optimum Gravatar Cache FV Gravatar Cache

Active installs, each indexed to 100 at the start of the window. A line above 100 is growing its install base, below 100 is shrinking.

Metric	Optimum Gravatar Cache	FV Gravatar Cache
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	100–200	600–700 ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	0% ✓	-14%
Overall health	D · 51	C · 62 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	15/100	48/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	78/100 ✓	72/100
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (adjusted)	4.12★ ✓	3.90★
Reviews	3	11 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	59/100	75/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Elevated	Low ✓
Last updated	2.6y ago	1.3y ago ✓
Downloads · 30d	177 ✓	165
Category	Performance	Performance

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

Optimum Gravatar Cache FV Gravatar Cache

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.