← Compare

Ozh' Tweet Archiver vs Customize Feeds for Twitter

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Customize Feeds for Twitter is the safest pick: health C · 64 against 45 for Ozh' Tweet Archiver, led by lower removal risk.

Active-install trajectory

Ozh' Tweet Archiver moved down one install band, 40+ to 30+. That's a single step across the whole window, so there's no trajectory to draw. The download trend below moves daily.

Metric	Ozh' Tweet Archiver	Customize Feeds for Twitter
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	30–40	4K–5K ✓
Active installs, change over ~6 months Compares the public install bands. One band step shows as the band change, not a percentage.	-25%	Stable ✓
Overall health	D · 45	C · 64 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	3/100	48/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	74/100	77/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.0★	4.1★ ✓
Reviews	6	18 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	60/100	78/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Elevated	Low ✓
Last updated	11.4y ago	1.3y ago ✓
Downloads, last 30d	71	867 ✓
Download momentum, last 30d vs prior 30d Dips that follow a release spike are normal: wp.org counts every update as a download, so the weeks after a release run lower.	-26%	+37%
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	0.3%	1.0% ✓
Category	Content & Feeds	Social

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

Ozh' Tweet ArchiverCustomize Feeds for Twitter

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.