PhastPress vs Berq Used CSS

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

PhastPress

by Albert Peschar

Health A91

Berq Used CSS

by BerqWP

Health B84

Active-install trajectory

PhastPressBerq Used CSS

Active installs, each indexed to 100 at the start of the window. A line above 100 is growing its install base, below 100 is shrinking.

Metric	PhastPress	Berq Used CSS
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	10K–20K ✓	70–80
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	0%	+600% ✓
Overall health	A · 91 ✓	B · 84
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	100/100	100/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	96/100 ✓	76/100
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.8★ ✓	4.1★
Reviews	99 ✓	2
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	98/100 ✓	90/100
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Low	Low
Last updated	9d ago ✓	19d ago
Downloads · 30d	9K ✓	366
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	1.8%	5.7% ✓
Category	Performance	Performance

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

PhastPressBerq Used CSS

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.