← Compare

Picturefill.WP vs RICG Responsive Images

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Picturefill.WP and RICG Responsive Images are close on health (D · 48 vs D · 48), with nothing separating them on the sub-scores.

Active-install trajectory

Picturefill.WPRICG Responsive Images

Active installs, each indexed to 100 at the start of the window. A line above 100 is growing its install base, below 100 is shrinking.

Metric	Picturefill.WP	RICG Responsive Images
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	40–50	2K–3K ✓
Active installs, change over ~6 months Compares the public install bands. One band step shows as the band change, not a percentage.	-33%	Stable ✓
Overall health	D · 48	D · 48
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	3/100	3/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	83/100	85/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.3★	4.4★ ✓
Reviews	7	20 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	38/100	43/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	High	High
Last updated	12.3y ago	8.9y ago ✓
Downloads, last 30d	82	353 ✓
Download momentum, last 30d vs prior 30d Dips that follow a release spike are normal: wp.org counts every update as a download, so the weeks after a release run lower.	+1%	+45%
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	0.4%	1.3% ✓
Category	Uncategorized	Uncategorized

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

Picturefill.WPRICG Responsive Images

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.