Pilo'Press vs Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®)

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Health D48

Health A96

Active-install trajectory

Pilo'Press moved down one install band, 100+ to 90+. That's a single step across the whole window, so there's no trajectory to draw. The download trend below moves daily.

Metric	Pilo'Press	Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®)
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	90–100	2M–3M ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	-10%	0% ✓
Overall health	D · 48	A · 96 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	5/100	100/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	80/100	88/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	100/100 ✓
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.2★	4.5★ ✓
Reviews	4	1,440 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	44/100	98/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Elevated	Low ✓
Last updated	3.6y ago	2d ago ✓
Downloads · 30d	85	908.6K ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	1.4%	2.6% ✓
Category	Page Builders	Uncategorized

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

Pilo'PressAdvanced Custom Fields (ACF®)

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.