Post Type Select Field for Advanced Custom Fields vs ACF Content Analysis for Yoast SEO
Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.
ACF Content Analysis for Yoast SEO is the safest pick: health B · 84 against 45 for Post Type Select Field for Advanced Custom Fields, led by lower removal risk.
No change to chart. WordPress.org reports active installs in coarse bands, so neither plugin crossed a band during this window. The download trend below moves daily and is the better read over a period this short.
Metric
Post Type Select Field for Advanced Custom Fields
ACF Content Analysis for Yoast SEO
Active installsModeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.
900–1K
100K–200K ✓
Active installs, change over ~6 monthsCompares the public install bands. One band step shows as the band change, not a percentage.
Stable
Stable
Overall health
D · 45
B · 84 ✓
MaintenanceHow recently the plugin was updated.
3/100
100/100 ✓
Rating qualityVolume-adjusted review quality.
76/100
76/100
SupportShare of forum threads marked resolved.
70/100
70/100
Rating (weighted for review count)
4.1★ ✓
4.0★
Reviews
2
35 ✓
Ranking optimizationHow well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.
35/100
96/100 ✓
Removal riskMaintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.
High
Low ✓
Last updated
9.4y ago
1mo ago ✓
Downloads, last 30d
254
37.8K ✓
Download momentum, last 30d vs prior 30dDips that follow a release spike are normal: wp.org counts every update as a download, so the weeks after a release run lower.
+32%
+30%
Install conversionActive installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.
5.7% ✓
3.6%
Category
Developer Tools
Developer Tools
✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.
Release activity
Post Type Select Field for Advanced Custom FieldsACF Content Analysis for Yoast SEO
7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.