Plugin Pulse Beta
← Compare

Powered Cache vs WP Fastest Cache

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Active-install trajectory

No change to chart. WordPress.org reports active installs in coarse bands, so neither plugin crossed a band during this window. The download trend below moves daily and is the better read over a period this short.

Metric Powered Cache WP Fastest Cache
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads. 3K–4K 1M–2M ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window. 0% 0%
Overall health A · 91 ✓ A · 89
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated. 100/100 100/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality. 91/100 97/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved. 75/100 ✓ 62/100
Rating (weighted for review count) 4.6★ 4.9★ ✓
Reviews 58 4,229 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org. 93/100 ✓ 92/100
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status. Low Low
Last updated 14d ago yesterday ✓
Downloads · 30d 4.3K 951.4K ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower. 2.1% ✓ 1.5%
Category Performance Performance

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

Powered CacheWP Fastest Cache

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.