Reject Urls And Emails In Textarea For (Gravity Fo vs Gravity Forms Reject Disposable Emails
Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.
Gravity Forms Reject Disposable Emails and Reject Urls And Emails In Textarea For (Gravity Fo are close on health (D · 46 vs D · 45), with nothing separating them on the sub-scores.
No change to chart. WordPress.org reports active installs in coarse bands, so neither plugin crossed a band during this window. The download trend below moves daily and is the better read over a period this short.
Metric
Reject Urls And Emails In Textarea For (Gravity Fo
Gravity Forms Reject Disposable Emails
Active installsModeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.
700–800 ✓
10–20
Active installs, change over ~6 monthsCompares the public install bands. One band step shows as the band change, not a percentage.
Stable
Stable
Overall health
D · 45
D · 46 ✓
MaintenanceHow recently the plugin was updated.
3/100
3/100
Rating qualityVolume-adjusted review quality.
74/100
78/100 ✓
SupportShare of forum threads marked resolved.
70/100
70/100
Rating (weighted for review count)
4.0★
4.1★ ✓
Reviews
1
3 ✓
Ranking optimizationHow well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.
36/100 ✓
35/100
Removal riskMaintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.
High
High
Last updated
10.8y ago ✓
12.8y ago
Downloads, last 30d
165 ✓
155
Download momentum, last 30d vs prior 30dDips that follow a release spike are normal: wp.org counts every update as a download, so the weeks after a release run lower.
+67%
-2%
Install conversionActive installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.
21% ✓
0.1%
Category
Email & Marketing
Email & Marketing
✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.
Release activity
Reject Urls And Emails In Textarea For (Gravity FoGravity Forms Reject Disposable Emails
7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.