Plugin Pulse Beta
← Compare

Core Web Vitals Booster vs WP Fastest Cache

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Active-install trajectory

Core Web Vitals BoosterWP Fastest Cache

Active installs, each indexed to 100 at the start of the window. A line above 100 is growing its install base, below 100 is shrinking.

Metric Core Web Vitals Booster WP Fastest Cache
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads. 80–90 1M–2M ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window. -20% 0% ✓
Overall health D · 47 A · 89 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated. 17/100 100/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality. 66/100 97/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved. 70/100 ✓ 62/100
Rating (weighted for review count) 3.7★ 4.9★ ✓
Reviews 7 4,229 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org. 57/100 92/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status. Elevated Low ✓
Last updated 2.5y ago yesterday ✓
Downloads · 30d 95 951.4K ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower. 0.0% 1.5% ✓
Category Performance Performance

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

Core Web Vitals BoosterWP Fastest Cache

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.