Superflow: AI Website QA & Visual Feedback vs Marker.io

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Superflow: AI Website QA & Visual Feedback

Health B83

Health B78

Active-install trajectory

Superflow: AI Website QA & Visual Feedback moved down one install band, 30+ to 20+. That's a single step across the whole window, so there's no trajectory to draw. The download trend below moves daily.

Metric	Superflow: AI Website QA & Visual Feedback	Marker.io
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	20–30	4K–5K ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	-33%	0% ✓
Overall health	B · 83 ✓	B · 78
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	100/100 ✓	68/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	74/100	95/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.0★	4.7★ ✓
Reviews	1	44 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	88/100	88/100
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Low	Low
Last updated	2mo ago ✓	11mo ago
Downloads · 30d	211	7.3K ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	0.8%	1.3% ✓
Category	Analytics	Analytics

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

Superflow: AI Website QA & Visual FeedbackMarker.io

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.