TinyPNG for WordPress vs Autoptimize

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Health F38

Health A94

Active-install trajectory

TinyPNG for WordPress moved down one install band, 200+ to 100+; Autoptimize moved down one install band, 900K+ to 800K+. That's a single step across the whole window, so there's no trajectory to draw. The download trend below moves daily.

Metric	TinyPNG for WordPress	Autoptimize
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	100–200	800K–900K ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	-50%	-11% ✓
Overall health	F · 38	A · 94 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	3/100	100/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	54/100	94/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	86/100 ✓
Rating (weighted for review count)	3.2★	4.7★ ✓
Reviews	6	1,428 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	36/100	96/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	High	Low ✓
Last updated	11.0y ago	9d ago ✓
Downloads · 30d	89	581.1K ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	0.8%	1.8% ✓
Category	Performance	Performance

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

TinyPNG for WordPressAutoptimize

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.