← Compare

ViralMarketingWP vs Viral Loops WP Integration

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

ViralMarketingWP and Viral Loops WP Integration are close on health (C · 60 vs C · 59). ViralMarketingWP has the stronger rating quality.

Active-install trajectory

No change to chart. WordPress.org reports active installs in coarse bands, so neither plugin crossed a band during this window. The download trend below moves daily and is the better read over a period this short.

Metric	ViralMarketingWP	Viral Loops WP Integration
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	—	200–300 ✓
Active installs, change over ~6 months Compares the public install bands. One band step shows as the band change, not a percentage.	—	Stable ✓
Overall health	C · 60 ✓	C · 59
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	41/100	43/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	74/100 ✓	69/100
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.0★ ✓	3.8★
Reviews	1	2 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	68/100 ✓	57/100
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Low	Low
Last updated	1.5y ago	1.4y ago ✓
Downloads, last 30d	39	179 ✓
Download momentum, last 30d vs prior 30d Dips that follow a release spike are normal: wp.org counts every update as a download, so the weeks after a release run lower.	+42%	+15%
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	—	0.8% ✓
Category	Email & Marketing	Email & Marketing

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

ViralMarketingWPViral Loops WP Integration

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.