WC vs ACF City Selector

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

WC is the only plugin here with enough reviews to score.

Health B84

Health B80

Active-install trajectory

WC moved up one install band, 90+ to 100+; ACF City Selector moved down one install band, 200+ to 100+. That's a single step across the whole window, so there's no trajectory to draw. The download trend below moves daily.

Metric	WC	ACF City Selector
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	100–200	100–200 ✓
Active installs, change over ~6 months Compares the public install bands. One band step shows as the band change, not a percentage.	+11% ✓	-50%
Overall health	B · 84 ✓	—
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	100/100 ✓	99/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	76/100 ✓	—
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100 ✓	—
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.1★ ✓	—
Reviews	3 ✓	0
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	89/100 ✓	88/100
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Low	Low
Last updated	2d ago ✓	3mo ago
Downloads, last 30d	458 ✓	267
Download momentum, last 30d vs prior 30d Dips that follow a release spike are normal: wp.org counts every update as a download, so the weeks after a release run lower.	+25%	+6%
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	1.1% ✓	0.9%
Category	Uncategorized	Developer Tools

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

WCACF City Selector

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.