WCC GF to Clio vs WCC CF7 to Clio

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Health C59

Health C61

Active-install trajectory

No change to chart. WordPress.org reports active installs in coarse bands, so neither plugin crossed a band during this window. The download trend below moves daily and is the better read over a period this short.

Metric	WCC GF to Clio	WCC CF7 to Clio
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	10–20 ✓	—
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	0% ✓	—
Overall health	C · 59	C · 61 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	43/100	43/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	69/100	74/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (adjusted)	3.77★	3.98★ ✓
Reviews	2 ✓	1
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	74/100	74/100
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Low	Low
Last updated	1.4y ago	1.4y ago
Downloads · 30d	38 ✓	26
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	1.2% ✓	—
Category	Forms	Forms

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

WCC GF to ClioWCC CF7 to Clio

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.