WEBO MCP vs AICOM

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

WEBO MCP

by phuongwebo

Health B80

AICOM

by dudaster

Health B83

Active-install trajectory

WEBO MCPAICOM

Active installs, each indexed to 100 at the start of the window. A line above 100 is growing its install base, below 100 is shrinking.

Metric	WEBO MCP	AICOM
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	40–50	60–70 ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	+100%	+500% ✓
Overall health	—	B · 83 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	100/100	100/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	—	74/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	—	70/100 ✓
Rating (weighted for review count)	—	4.0★ ✓
Reviews	0	1 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	88/100	90/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Low	Low
Last updated	1mo ago	14d ago ✓
Downloads · 30d	588	1.4K ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	1.0%	1.2% ✓
Category	AI	AI

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

WEBO MCPAICOM

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.