WeBWorK Q&A vs WP QuickLaTeX

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Health B79

Health C56

Active-install trajectory

WP QuickLaTeX moved down one install band, 5K+ to 4K+. That's a single step across the whole window, so there's no trajectory to draw. The download trend below moves daily.

Metric	WeBWorK Q&A	WP QuickLaTeX
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	—	4K–5K ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	—	-20% ✓
Overall health	—	C · 56 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	97/100 ✓	19/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	—	87/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	—	70/100 ✓
Rating (weighted for review count)	—	4.4★ ✓
Reviews	0	31 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	86/100 ✓	55/100
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Low ✓	Elevated
Last updated	4mo ago ✓	2.4y ago
Downloads · 30d	39	819 ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	—	3.9% ✓
Category	Uncategorized	Uncategorized

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

WeBWorK Q&AWP QuickLaTeX

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.