Whols vs B2BKing

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

B2BKing and Whols are close on health (A · 91 vs A · 88). B2BKing has the stronger rating quality.

Whols

by HT Plugins

Health A88

B2BKing

by KingsPlugins

Health A91

Active-install trajectory

WholsB2BKing

Active installs, each indexed to 100 at the start of the window. A line above 100 is growing its install base, below 100 is shrinking.

Metric	Whols	B2BKing
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	3K–4K	10K–20K ✓
Active installs, change over ~6 months Compares the public install bands. One band step shows as the band change, not a percentage.	+200% ✓	Stable
Overall health	A · 88	A · 91 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	100/100	100/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	88/100	97/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.5★	4.8★ ✓
Reviews	14	109 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	93/100	98/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Low	Low
Last updated	11d ago ✓	1mo ago
Downloads, last 30d	4.7K	9.7K ✓
Download momentum, last 30d vs prior 30d Dips that follow a release spike are normal: wp.org counts every update as a download, so the weeks after a release run lower.	-3%	+48%
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	3.5% ✓	3.4%
Category	eCommerce	eCommerce

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

WholsB2BKing

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.