WP-Auto Image Grabber vs Autoptimize

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

WP-Auto Image Grabber

by Meitar

Health D41

Autoptimize

by Optimizing Matters

Health A90

Active-install trajectory

WP-Auto Image Grabber Autoptimize

Active installs, each indexed to 100 at the start of the window. A line above 100 is growing its install base, below 100 is shrinking.

Metric	WP-Auto Image Grabber	Autoptimize
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	20–30	800K–900K ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	+100% ✓	-11%
Overall health	D · 41	A · 90 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	3/100	100/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	65/100	94/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (adjusted)	3.60★	4.72★ ✓
Reviews	0	1,428 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	28/100	89/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	High	Low ✓
Last updated	15.5y ago	11d ago ✓
Downloads · 30d	60	80.3K ✓
Category	Uncategorized	Performance

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

WP-Auto Image Grabber Autoptimize

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.