WP images lazy loading vs Autoptimize

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Health D44

Health A94

Active-install trajectory

Autoptimize moved down one install band, 900K+ to 800K+. That's a single step across the whole window, so there's no trajectory to draw. The download trend below moves daily.

Metric	WP images lazy loading	Autoptimize
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	100–200	800K–900K ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	0% ✓	-11%
Overall health	D · 44	A · 94 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	3/100	100/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	73/100	94/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	86/100 ✓
Rating (weighted for review count)	3.9★	4.7★ ✓
Reviews	4	1,428 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	37/100	96/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	High	Low ✓
Last updated	10.5y ago	10d ago ✓
Downloads · 30d	96	585.6K ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	0.7%	1.8% ✓
Category	Performance	Performance

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

WP images lazy loadingAutoptimize

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.