WP QuickLaTeX vs WP LaTeX

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Health C56

Health B73

Active-install trajectory

WP QuickLaTeX moved down one install band, 5K+ to 4K+; WP LaTeX moved down one install band, 800+ to 700+. That's a single step across the whole window, so there's no trajectory to draw. The download trend below moves daily.

Metric	WP QuickLaTeX	WP LaTeX
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	4K–5K ✓	700–800
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	-20%	-13% ✓
Overall health	C · 56	B · 73 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	19/100	64/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	87/100 ✓	86/100
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.4★ ✓	4.4★
Reviews	31 ✓	10
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	55/100	59/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Elevated	Low ✓
Last updated	2.4y ago	12mo ago ✓
Downloads · 30d	844 ✓	226
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	3.9% ✓	1.5%
Category	Uncategorized	Uncategorized

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

WP QuickLaTeXWP LaTeX

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.