Wp-Thumbie vs YARPP

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Wp-Thumbie

by blogsdna

Health F39

YARPP

by YARPP

Health C63

Active-install trajectory

Wp-Thumbie YARPP

Active installs, each indexed to 100 at the start of the window. A line above 100 is growing its install base, below 100 is shrinking.

Metric	Wp-Thumbie	YARPP
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	80–90	100K–200K ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	-11%	0% ✓
Overall health	F · 39	C · 63 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	3/100	31/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	58/100	95/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (adjusted)	3.32★	4.78★ ✓
Reviews	3	1,162 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	36/100	69/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	High	Low ✓
Last updated	14.4y ago	1.8y ago ✓
Downloads · 30d	50	6.8K ✓
Category	Uncategorized	SEO

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

Wp-Thumbie YARPP

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.