← Compare

Xhanch vs Tools for Twitter

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Xhanch is the safest pick: health D · 47 against 42 for Tools for Twitter, led by stronger rating quality.

Active-install trajectory

Xhanch moved down one install band, 200+ to 100+. That's a single step across the whole window, so there's no trajectory to draw. The download trend below moves daily.

Metric	Xhanch	Tools for Twitter
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	100–200	1K–2K ✓
Active installs, change over ~6 months Compares the public install bands. One band step shows as the band change, not a percentage.	200+ → 100+	Stable ✓
Overall health	D · 47 ✓	D · 42
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	3/100	3/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	80/100 ✓	67/100
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.2★ ✓	3.7★
Reviews	4	6 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	38/100 ✓	37/100
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	High	High
Last updated	10.2y ago	6.7y ago ✓
Downloads, last 30d	106	379 ✓
Download momentum, last 30d vs prior 30d Dips that follow a release spike are normal: wp.org counts every update as a download, so the weeks after a release run lower.	-12%	+39%
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	0.0%	0.1% ✓
Category	Social	Social

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

XhanchTools for Twitter

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.