← Compare

Zhanzhangb Indexing Submission for Baidu vs Wppao Sitemap

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Zhanzhangb Indexing Submission for Baidu is the safest pick: health A · 86 against 45 for Wppao Sitemap, led by lower removal risk.

Active-install trajectory

Zhanzhangb Indexing Submission for BaiduWppao Sitemap

Active installs, each indexed to 100 at the start of the window. A line above 100 is growing its install base, below 100 is shrinking.

Metric	Zhanzhangb Indexing Submission for Baidu	Wppao Sitemap
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	2K–3K	5K–6K ✓
Active installs, change over ~6 months Compares the public install bands. One band step shows as the band change, not a percentage.	Stable ✓	-50%
Overall health	A · 86 ✓	D · 45
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	100/100 ✓	3/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	80/100 ✓	74/100
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.2★ ✓	4.0★
Reviews	4 ✓	1
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	82/100 ✓	35/100
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Low ✓	High
Last updated	2mo ago ✓	6.5y ago
Downloads, last 30d	649 ✓	418
Download momentum, last 30d vs prior 30d Dips that follow a release spike are normal: wp.org counts every update as a download, so the weeks after a release run lower.	+25%	+49%
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	5.5%	27% ✓
Category	SEO	SEO

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

Zhanzhangb Indexing Submission for BaiduWppao Sitemap

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.