FD Footnotes Plugin
by fd · Uncategorized
Also makes 1 other plugin · 1.1K+ installs across the portfolio →
Add elegant looking footnotes to your posts simply and naturally.
Try it live opens a temporary test site in your browser, which can take about 20 seconds to load. Plugins that rely on outside services or a full server may not work completely there.
Health
D 47/100
Stale · Likely abandoned
Active installs
1K+
≈1.5K estimated
Momentum
+12%
downloads vs prior 30d
Biggest opportunity: Under-ranked on “endnotes”. wp.org puts you #20; on merit you place #9. The plugins above you are winning on install count, not on rating or upkeep.
47 health vs 58 average across 25,764 Uncategorized plugins
Install conversion
How it's measured →1.7%
of downloads still active
At least 1K of 57.6K lifetime downloads are still running, above its category: the median Uncategorized plugin keeps 0.6%, across 17,772 plugins.
Downloads count every update, not just first installs, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower. Compare against other Uncategorized plugins, not across the directory. wp.org reports active installs as the bottom of a band, so the real rate is this or higher.
High removal-risk signals
63/100Maintenance and integrity signals that tend to precede a WordPress.org removal. Not an official status, a heads-up to act.
- Long abandoned. No update in 10+ years — the top precursor to removal once a vulnerability is found.
- Compatibility drift. Tested only up to WordPress 4.3.34, well behind 6.8.
Details
Directory ranking optimization
How it's scored →How well this listing is tuned to rank in WordPress.org search, on the factors an owner controls. Not popularity, optimization.
Under-optimized
Most to gain: Update recency
Updated 3801 days ago, past the ~180 days where wp.org starts discounting
Tested up to WordPress 4.3.34; the current branch is 6.8
4.5★ over 21 reviews, smoothed to 4.22★ and held back under 25 reviews
5 of 5 tags set · short description in place
To rank higher: Last updated 3801 days ago — ship an update; wp.org decays a listing's search weight after ~180 days.
Get the full rank-higher report →Search visibility
How it's tracked →Directory searches this plugin turns up in, and which way each one is moving. WordPress.org publishes no history of search positions, so this starts the day we first tracked a keyword and never backfills.
Not enough tracked days yet to call a direction. Momentum needs at least three keywords measured a week or more apart.
wp.org is where the directory puts the plugin for that search. On merit is where it would sit if results were ranked on rating, support and updates, without the install boost. The last column is how far the wp.org position moved, from our first reading in the last 90 days to the latest.
| Keyword | wp.org | On merit | wp.org move, 90 days |
|---|---|---|---|
| endnotes your tag | #20 | #9 | 0 |
| editing your tag | Not in the top 24 | ||
| footnotes your tag | Not in the top 24 | ||
| posts your tag | Not in the top 24 | ||
| writing your tag | Not in the top 24 | ||
1 search this plugin appeared in over the last 90 days. 4 of its tags aren't in the top 24 for their own search.
What to do about it
- Under-ranked on “endnotes”. wp.org puts you #20; on merit you place #9. The plugins above you are winning on install count, not on rating or upkeep.
- “editing”, “footnotes” and “posts” aren't earning a slot. You list them, but you're not in the first 24 results for those searches. WordPress.org counts only your first five tags, so free the slot for a search you can win.
Daily downloads
Since 5 Oct 2022 · 1,490 days · wp.org + Plugin Pulse archive
30-day downloads
Rolling 30-day volume · peak 266 · peaks are release surges
Directory rank vs rivals
wp.org popularity rank over time · higher is better · when a rival's line climbs above yours, they've overtaken you
Rating trend
Star average over time · dips mark rough releases
Health trend
Composite health score, snapshotted daily
Update activity
How busy the existing users are, measured as downloads in the last 30 days for every 1,000 active sites. A spike means a new release everyone's pulling; a long, slow decline means an aging user base that updates less.
What its installed base runs
via wordpress.orgShare of active installs on each version of this plugin · 97% run the current release. Green is the current release; a big slice on older versions is a user base that has stopped updating.
Estimated active installs
The public count shows “1K+”. Our estimate pins where the real number sits.
Crossed into this band 24 months ago; the previous band took 2.6 years to cross, which places it about 50% of the way through.
Install history since 27 May 2015
Recent reviews
All reviews on wp.org ↗- ★★★★★ inge128.1y ago
We’ve been using this plugin for maybe 6 years or more. It is now September 2018, and the plugin has been apparently abandoned. But apparently the code was good enough that it is still working flawlessly on our site, where we use footnotes regularly.. I understand the “Footnotation” plugin works with the same [1. Footnote .. ] code. If this should stop working, we’ll try that one. If someone know of a way to notify the author, perhaps he could post a minor “update” so it doesn’t look abandoned.
Read on wp.org ↗ - ★★★★★ ostinatofreak8.4y ago
Would be five stars, except my Wordfence security plugin just notified me today that it appears FD Footnotes is “abandoned” (updated June 6, 2016, tested to WP 4.3.16). I hope the developer does what is necessary to keep this plugin up to date!
Read on wp.org ↗ - ★★★★★ JK9.1y ago
Using it on all my websites, one of my favourite plugins in order to keep content not really belonging to the post separated, but still mentioning it. Edtit in 10/2020: Although not maintained since 2016, plugin works for me, very happy with it. This topic was modified 5 years, 9 months ago by JK. Reason: Update of use
Read on wp.org ↗ - ★★★★★ typotamer10.7y ago
I really like the basic functionality of this plugin, but there is a HUGE issue with it, and that is that you cannot use square brackets in your footnotes. MANY cites require square brackets. However, because this plugin uses square brackets to denote the beginning and end of a footnote, if you use them elsewhere, the text within said brackets disappears. Unfortunately, that renders this plugin pretty much useless for me. Darn it. 🙁
Read on wp.org ↗ - ★★★★★ jdaniel11.0y ago
I use it since many years and love it. Great plugin!
Read on wp.org ↗ - ★★★★★ IslandOwl11.1y ago
Here is a slightly updated version to the wonderful code that @johanneseva wrote to stylize the footnote section to look more like a footnote section (smaller font, line above section, etc.) The only addition I made is to put a space (bottom margin) between the footnote line items. I also increased the line size itself from 1em to 1.2em for better readability. sup.footnote a { text-decoration: underline; vertical-align: super; font-weight: bold; font-size: 80%; padding-left: 0.3em; } .footnotedivider { width: 40%; padding-top: 0.8em; border-top: 1px solid #000; } .footnotes { font-size: 72%; } .footnotes li { line-height: 1.2em; margin-bottom: 6px; } I have been using this FD Plugin for a few years now. It is GREAT! Simple to use and just works.
Read on wp.org ↗ - ★★★★★ Devon Ostendorf11.5y ago
Thanks for a very easy-to-use plugin that performs as advertised!
Read on wp.org ↗ - ★★★★★ krishocker11.7y ago
I use footnotes on just about every post and page on my site. This plugin provides a simple, easy-to-use solution that doesn’t interrupt the flow of my writing.
Read on wp.org ↗
AI assistants
How it's measured →Whether ChatGPT and Claude name this plugin when asked the category question, and whether the readme gives them something to quote.
Not measured yet for this plugin’s topics. Its tracked searches are not among the measured topics. See the topics measured so far.
Readme readiness
2 of 8 pass · checked 27 Oct 2026Can an assistant quote this readme? Eight deterministic checks over the wp.org listing, no model involved.
- ✓ Says what it does "Add elegant looking footnotes to your posts simply and naturally."
- ! Has a FAQ No FAQ section.
- ! FAQ asks real questions No FAQ to judge.
- ! Names who it is for One audience phrase ("if you have"); say who the plugin is for and what they use it for.
- ! Names what it works with Names no plugin, service or platform it works with.
- ! Headings and lists 1 heading and 0 lists; assistants quote headed sections and bullet lists, not paragraphs.
- ✓ Enough to quote 1,726 characters of description.
- ! Tags match the text Only 2 of 5 tags appear in the text ("editing", "endnotes", "writing" missing).
Growth timeline
Install-tier crossings we have observed, and how long each tier took to outgrow
- 2024-11-09 2K+ → 1K+ down after 967 days in tier
- 2022-03-18 3K+ → 2K+ down after 633 days in tier
- 2020-06-23 6K+ → 3K+ down after 1666 days in tier
- 2015-12-01 5K+ → 6K+ up
Competes with
The plugins that solve the same job, ranked by shared tags then reach, closest match first. The letter on the right is each plugin's health grade (A best, F worst).
- F FD Word Statistics Plugin 100+ installs · 4.1★ · 3 shared tags D
- S Simple Footnotes 600+ installs · 4.4★ · 2 shared tags D
-
Blank Footnotes 300+ installs · 4.3★ · 2 shared tags A -
Footnotation 100+ installs · 4.2★ · 2 shared tags D -
GenerateBlocks 200K+ installs · 4.8★ · 1 shared tag A -
Post Duplicator 200K+ installs · 4.7★ · 1 shared tag A
Embed this report card
Drop a live Pulse card for FD Footnotes Plugin into a readme, a review or a deck. It updates itself.
<iframe src="https://plugins.wpmayor.com/embed/fd-footnotes" width="480" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="FD Footnotes Plugin — Plugin Pulse"></iframe> FD Footnotes Plugin: 1K+ active installs, 4.5★ (21 reviews). Plugin Pulse (WP Mayor), as of 2026-11-02. https://plugins.wpmayor.com/plugin/fd-footnotes
Spotted a number that looks wrong? Report a data issue and we'll check it against the source.